Final Project (in progress)

The Supreme Court of Canada will play a big role in deciding what school Alexia Silvestri will be attending in the fall. Her parents are awaiting a Supreme Court decision on the legality of Quebec’s Bill 104, which affects accessibility of students to the English public school system in Quebec.

Bill 104 has already affected the education of thousands of Quebecers. However, the law was challenged in court and in 2006, the Appeals Court dismissed the law, saying it infringed the Canadian Charter Right for minority language rights. Overall the appeal process has taken seven years.

Most of the appellants to the initial appeal have since graduated from school or moved away. Their lawyer, Brent Tyler, said that this turn of events is hardly surprising.

“We expected this to happen. Some parents cannot afford to stay involved in a long drawn-out process.” Tyler noted that of the original 130 families who were involved in the initial challenge, only 25 remained. Even the main appellant Hong Nguyen, for whom the case is named, moved to the United States because his child would graduate from high school before the Supreme Court would issue a ruling.

This episode is the latest in a long line of struggles that has marked the right to English education in the province of Quebec since the early 1950s.

What used to be a battle to keep students from entering the French school system has turned into a battle to keep them there.

Frank Valenti knows a thing or two about being turned away from French school. He came from Italy in 1960 and remembers when local authorities wanted to restrict French school to francophones. “It was as if Italian Catholics and French Catholics were two different peoples. First they wanted us in English school. Then the government changed their mind. I remember how angry my parents were.”

Frank took part in the infamous Saint Leonard riots in 1968 in the tiny Montreal suburb. After quietly encouraging Catholic immigrants to get their education in English, Quebec politicians feared the French language would fade if immigrants kept learning English.

“Why were we second class citizens?” Valenti asks. “I am lucky they put me in English school. Now my kids get a better education.”

Frank’s kids have access to English education because the Quebec government restricts access to the English education system only to those whose parents have received instruction in English in Canada. Robert Bourassa instituted this law in 1973, so all the children of immigrants who came to Quebec as adults were forced into the French system.

Veronica Silvestri finds herself in a similar situation. Her parents immigrated in 1962 but were too old to go to school. As a result, Veronica and her four older siblings all went to French school. Her husband Sergio is in the same scenario.

Despite going to school in French, Veronica and her husband speak mostly English in the home. Before 2002, they would have been able to send Alexia to an English private school for one year, and then transfer her over to the English public school system.

There was a loophole in the Quebec education system, which allowed parents of ineligible children to get in through the backdoor. Bill 104 closed this loophole. If the court invalidates the law, Alexia would be headed to English private school in the fall for one year.

The Quebec government wants to prevent this loophole from flooding the English school system with ineligible children. Lawyer Brent Tyler disputes the government’s fears. “This is such a small portion of the overall figures of English students. The French language I hardly threatened by a few hundred kids.”

According to figures released by the Quebec Ministry of Education, students using the exemption to get around the law account for a fraction of one percent of students in the Quebec education system. English students account for 11% of all children in elementary and secondary schools in Quebec. Of that 11%, less than 2% of students are affected by this change.

For Brent Tyler, this is a rights issue. “We see scenarios where families have to move away to prevent their children from failing school.” Among the case’s 130 appellants, one child was forced to switch from English to French school between elementary and secondary school. In English school he was a straight-A student. He failed grade seven and has seen his grades plummet.

Tyler questions whom the government is trying to help here. “This is ridiculous. The bureaucracy is affecting the academic future of some of these kids.”

Once the ruling comes down this spring, hundreds of Quebec families are hoping to have a little bit more control over their children’s education.

Alexia Silvestri began Kindergarten just after her fifth birthday in September. She is adapting quickly to the French environment and is doing well at school. Veronica would transfer her to English private school for one year if she had the option.

“She has many more opportunities with the English language credentials. I do not want my daughter to be educated as a unilingual francophone. They do not teach English in French schools like they teach French in English schools.”

The public school Veronica is looking to eventually send her daughter to is East Hill in the East End of Montreal. It is a school that teaches Grades 1-3 in French and Grades 4-6 in 50-50 French English Immersion. The school is only open to students eligible for English education.

“I find it silly that I have to get Alexia eligible for an English school to send her to an elementary school that is 75% French.”

French schools only offer one hour of English education until Grade 4, where it increases to four hours of education per week. Many parents fear their children will not know enough English to enter the workforce in Montreal.

“Where I work now, you need to be bilingual. We deal with American clients as well as other companies in English Canada. Speaking both languages is the key to getting a good job here. I want to help out my daughter as much as possible.”

Once the decision is made by the Supreme Court of Canada, it is expected to be final. The section of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that protects minority language education in Canada cannot be superceded by the not-withstanding clause.

“The Quebec government would be sent back to the drawing board and have to come up with a new law,” Tyler says. The fear from many activists in the English community in Montreal is that the government will draft legislation similar to the last one and kick off another seven year legal marathon through the courts.

“These families deserve better than this. I hope if they try anything similar to Bill 104, we will be able to convince the court to let the old law stand until it is debated,” states Tyler. “Only 25 families are left. They just want to move on.”

Veronica Silvestri will accept either outcome. She just wants a decision. “I want to know what my daughter’s future is. I guess it is a mother’s instinct.”

Frank Valenti also wants his neighbour to go to school with her best friend. “It would be nice to have Alexia in my daughter’s class. They speak to each other all the time. English or French, school is where you learn about life and nobody should be able to take that away. I hope I don’t have to go back and get my signs and start another riot. All we can do is wait.”

Exercise Soundslides!

Canada’s Economy is a Small Fish in a Big Sea (Manyeyes Bubble Chart)

Timeline (Quebec education issues pre Bill 104)

Comparing soundslides projects…(or people who can take pictures way better than me)

I looked at the New York Times and Washington Posts soundslides projects and it gave me more of a feel for how I want to use this kind of tool in my future projects.

 

When I am looking at pictures and listening to audio, the last thing I want to do is read captions. Sometimes facts are important but I’d rather see a slide with a fact on it than a picture with a captioned fact at the bottom. Even though the internet allows us to go back and view things over, as a journalist, I really expect viewers to only watch my slideshow once.

 

You want to condense information but at the same time you don’t want to overload people as well.

 

I also realized how important the audio was in big picture. The Post slideshow kind of jumped around a little bit, and despite having the better images, it brought down the overall quality of the project. If ever I am going to use the soundslides to tell a story rather than as a fancy sidebar tool, I will have to write directly to the images which really means writing the story twice: once before you go out and get pictures and once after.

 

Overall, I think I learned quite a bit about how to take pictures after watching these two slideshows lol.

Soundslides

NewsU CourseTelling stories with sound

I really enjoyed this NewsU course because of its practicality.

It clearly outlined what the basics of using sound are with regards to different types of stories.

I enjoyed the emphasis on ambient sound, because most of the time in the audio work I produced, when I plyed a long clip of an interview, the lack of ambient sound made the final work sound a little stale.

Having the one specific story to use as a drawing board was also a helpful part of the NewsU course. I could see the individual tools in practice immediately.

Compared to the first NewsU course we had to do about blogging, this was night and day better. Maybe its because I had been blogging for a while and a new to telling stories with audio. Either way, I feel like I have come out of this class with a little more.

Project Text

This is bits and pieces of the backgrounder I will provide for my final project.

While some articles will be written about the subject, they are based on reactions and opinions of my interview subjects.

The Quebec English School Board Association is bracing itself for a big legal battle before the school year is out. A Supreme Court decision on the controversial Bill 104, the Quebec law limiting access to English schools, may affect the futures of thousands of Quebec families.

The Parti Quebecois introduced the controversial legislation in 2002. It closed a loophole that allowed students who were ineligible to attend public English school to sneak in through the backdoor after one year of attending an unsubsidized private English school.

Quebec families and Anglophone rights groups appealed the decision and the law was upheld in Quebec superior court. However, at the appeal level, the closing of the loophole was found to be unconstitutional under s.23 of the Canadian Constitution, which guarantees minority language rights in Canada.

The Quebec government has taken a position that in order to protect the future of the Quebec language, these few hundred families must not be allowed to circumvent the system. However, if the law were to be overturned, the enrollment of children in French school would diminish by less than 0.5%, while enrollment in English schools has dropped by over 60% in the last 25 years.

Political grandstanding is also an issue in this case. Many critics of the law question the Liberal Party of Quebec’s unwillingness to scrap the issue. They say Charest fears being perceived as someone who does not want to defend the French language in Quebec. Due to the fact that the Anglophone will never vote for any party other than the Liberal Party of Quebec, the Charest Liberals do not care about the political repercussions of this decision because in the end, they need francophone votes more.

The provincial government has to make a decision if the ruling nullifies the law on how to proceed. They have the ability to use the not-withstanding clause that would allow them to ignore the Supreme Court’s decision for five years until they could come up with a compromise.

There is currently heavy political pressure on Jean Charest, his language minister, Christine St-Pierre and Education Minister Michele Courschesne to use the not-withstanding clause or face considerable from the province’s French speaking voters. Protecting the French language is a lightning rod in Quebec politics and despite the small breadth of the issue, a mere 500 students per year, failing to “protect the French language” may do considerable damage to Quebec’s Liberals at the ballot box.

Families who want their kids to attend English school are mostly families who speak English at home and do not want their children to be educated in a language they do not use on a regular basis. They believe that educating these children in French will not increase the amount of French spoken in the province because once school is over, they return to speaking English regardless.

Francophone rights groups are standing firm in their necessity to protect the French language in Quebec at all costs. Despite the fact that the use of French has increased over the last generation, mainly due to the migration of Anglophones outside the province, these organizations insist this loophole is there to allow people to circumvent the laws.

One alternative that has been proposed to this system is to create a bilingual school system that would benefit all Quebecers who wish for their children to learn both official languages. This would allow the current English schools to be transformed into bilingual institutions and would give flexibility to parents when making this decision for their children.

Studies show that students who attend English school are far more bilingual than their counterparts in French school. Most French students can barely speak English outside of pop music songs or Hollywood movies. In a working environment where bilingualism is essential, the English students are currently at an advantage.

Comparing Online Projects

I really like what the makers of the Las Vegas piece did with their project. They told a story with videos and facts readily available whenever I wanted to ask a question about statistics or anything else related. They put all the information necessary to allow me to get much more than I would have been able to read in the newspaper.

One thing I am not sure about is just because it is easy for me, will it be easy to someone who isn’t as used to computers as I am.

The Yolanda’s Crossing story was more of a documentary told online. I like what the creators did but I feel that at the end of the day, a simple movie telling the story isn’t that far off, compared to the Las Vegas story.

One question I keep asking myself is whether or not newspapers, many of which are moving online to cut the costs of newsprint, are going to permanently move to this kind of story.

To get people to keep coming back, are newspapers going to have to turn every feature into something similar to the Las Vegas piece, or the piece on Anglophone Montrealers that was in the gazette last week.

Source List

Debbie Horrocks: President of the English Montreal School Board Association. She is leading the charge to fight Bill 104 in court. I have had email correspondance with her already. Her interview would be filmed.

Brent Tyler: Lawyer for the plaintiffs. He is the former head of Alliance Quebec. He will discuss the legality of the bill that is before the court. I have sent off an email and received some interest. His interview will also be filmed.

Christopher Shannon is the headmaster of Lower Canada College. The school has had some loophole students in the past. I will speak to him or the Director of the Schools Admission department depending on scheduling. This source is mostly for information to go in a graphic or table about how students are affected by the law.

Secondary

Michelle Courchesne: Minister of education for Quebec. Defends the current law that is being challenged. Two of the people in her office are former colleagues from my political days. It might help but the provincial government has been pretty mum on this issue.

Kathleen Weil: Anglophone Minister of Justice. Also really hard to get a hold of. She has vociferously refused to talk about this issue but is a backup in case the first one falls through.

I am also looking into speaking to a couple of the families involved in the loophole situation as well as a few students that have benefited from the loophole in the past. I expect the lawyer for the plaintiffs will be able to help me out with that.

Primary Sources

http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/dynamicSearch/telecharge.php?type=5&file=2002C28A.PDF

This is a copy of the law itself.

http://www.thecourt.ca/2008/05/06/quebec-v-nguyen-access-to-education-in-english-institutional-completeness-and-the-constitutionality-of-a-sentence-of-the-charter-of-the-french-language-rsq-c-c-11/

This is the position of one of the interveners.

http://www.canlii.org/en/qc/qcca/doc/2007/2007qcca1111/2007qcca1111.html

This is the appeal that was accepted.

http://www2.canada.com/montrealgazette/features/viewpoints/story.html?id=261690e2-16e5-4a06-943d-f6b8298a8a15

Article by former provincial MNA on how tricky this situation is.

Secondary Sources

http://www.montrealgazette.com/Life/Bill+decision+will+test+Liberals/1182785/story.html

This article is by two supporters of the elimination of the law.

http://www2.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/editorial/story.html?id=11e15b0b-9af4-4496-906f-c8c6fbf8f7d4

This is a link to how the law affects the community at large.

http://www.law.ualberta.ca/centres/ccs/news/?id=207

This is a legal summary of the case before the Supreme Court.

Recent Posts

Latest Links